You might be aware that all the news coverage of the murders of the young and beautiful vc students in virginia has been very intense in the last two weeks. While the news coverage is definitely not as intense as the coverage of the murders of many of the murdered students in other states, it is still intense. The media and government officials are blaming the “virginian killings” and the actions of the police and the media.
As it turns out, the government is not the only party who is blaming the police and the media. There’s a reason why the media is such a big business. It’s not just the media that gets the money to print the media. The media that writes the news and the news that gets the money to write the news is the biggest source of revenue for the media. The media spends a significant amount of money to create what they call “news”.
As a news outlet, we take it very seriously when we see that a certain group of people are willing to commit murder to make us look bad. We have a lot of rules that prohibit certain methods of protest, and our media is one of the few outlets allowed to publish pictures of victims of protests. Our police are also very strict when it comes to carrying out protests. To participate in protests or to engage in rioting is considered to be a criminal offense.
The only thing that could bring this situation to a close is if the government decided to shut down our media. That would be the end of it though because we have another way to report on the news. We have our own website/blog and we’ve already seen a lot of articles about the murder of virginia tech students.
The murder of virginia tech students is obviously a very violent and horrific event, but it’s also a very small incident compared to the scale of a protest. When a person is murdered, a protest is very much on the minds of the general public, and because of that our police are very strict in carrying out protests. As a result, they are more likely to be shot and killed than to be killed by protesters themselves.
We’re not exactly sure how much of a role protesters have in a protest, but we’re not too worried about it. The fact that protesters are more likely to be killed by protesters than they are by protesters themselves is very reassuring. There is a very large amount of violence in the world, and you never know when that violence will hit you.
The idea of being shot by protesters is not a new one. When Martin Luther King was shot and killed by a sniper he had been protesting, the idea that he would be killed by a protester was very real indeed. It was very easy to see the protesters as the ones that shot King because they were the ones that had created the conditions of a world that had become so violent in the first place.
When a person is murdered the last thing they have in their memory is their attacker and their motive. This is why the news report of the Virginia Tech shooting is so bizarre. It’s clear that the shooting was an act of terrorism and not an act of violence but the report fails to explain how the shooter, James Alex Fields, is the only person who knew that his killers were not in the same room as the shooting.
Field was a student at the University of Virginia and was known to have had a couple of run-ins with authorities in the past. In the most recent incident, he was arrested and charged with a double homicide in 1998. This is when the FBI was trying to make the point that they have a “zero-tolerance” policy towards domestic terrorism. He was also accused of having a “weapon” of some sort, which is why he was picked up.
Although the double homicide was in 1998, what happened to him in 2012 is still baffling. Field was in his forties, which is not old by any means, and is well known to the faculty of the UVA. We know that he would have been about 25 when the two murders took place in the Spring of 2012, but that’s another story.